← Back to Leaderboard

1122.johnpatetico@gmail.com#10 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 233 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

40.3%26.6%25.3%2 · 40.3%3 · 26.6%1 · 25.3%4 · 4.3%5 · 3.4%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

78.5%12.4%Very Fast · 78.5%Fast · 12.4%Medium · 3.9%Slow · 2.6%Very Slow · 2.6%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0510152025arbie.zbl@gmail.c…22 · 12.6%baluyotcaren017@g…21 · 12.1%rona_alt@1m8.ai19 · 10.9%ev.joannepagba@gm…19 · 10.9%markeugedl@gmail.…19 · 10.9%ev.1971teresa@gma…16 · 9.2%leneliagutierrez_…15 · 8.6%ev.ninzial@gmail.…15 · 8.6%ev.lounel4195@gma…14 · 8.0%mabs1797@yahoo.com14 · 8.0%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 121)Reworks (peak 3)Projects (peak 38)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate1.29%
Estimated Quality98.71%
Points789
Kickbacks3
Projects233
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 2 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.