← Back to Leaderboard

brayntniski@gmail.com#16 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 207 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

39.6%28.0%24.2%2 · 39.6%1 · 28.0%3 · 24.2%4 · 5.8%5 · 2.4%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

72.5%16.4%Very Fast · 72.5%Fast · 16.4%Slow · 5.3%Medium · 4.3%Very Slow · 1.4%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0510152025marflasola21@gmai…23 · 16.5%ralphdelacerna7@g…17 · 12.2%ev.lawrence4030@g…16 · 11.5%angelitosantos687…13 · 9.4%karlo19bautista@g…13 · 9.4%gerarddunnmanco@g…13 · 9.4%lyricjohn01@gmail…12 · 8.6%paolobren.dilag@g…12 · 8.6%nathanielolid@gma…11 · 7.9%ev.ryan2047@gmail…9 · 6.5%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 97)Reworks (peak 4)Projects (peak 31)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate5.31%
Estimated Quality94.69%
Points666
Kickbacks11
Projects207
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 0 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.