← Back to Leaderboard

jcanumay7@gmail.com#34 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 180 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

42.2%28.9%22.8%2 · 42.2%1 · 28.9%3 · 22.8%4 · 4.4%5 · 1.7%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

75.0%14.4%Very Fast · 75.0%Fast · 14.4%Slow · 5.6%Medium · 2.8%Very Slow · 2.2%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project03691215marflasola21@gmai…11 · 12.1%ev.lawrence4030@g…10 · 11.0%ev.1971teresa@gma…10 · 11.0%gerarddunnmanco@g…10 · 11.0%raypostrano@gmail…9 · 9.9%rona_alt@1m8.ai9 · 9.9%mabs1797@yahoo.com8 · 8.8%mercadojudeann@gm…8 · 8.8%ev.ninzial@gmail.…8 · 8.8%paolobren.dilag@g…8 · 8.8%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 73)Reworks (peak 3)Projects (peak 25)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate6.11%
Estimated Quality93.89%
Points576
Kickbacks11
Projects180
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 0 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.