← Back to Leaderboard

rhevedyjames1@gmail.com#70 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 114 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

44.7%25.4%22.8%2 · 44.7%1 · 25.4%3 · 22.8%4 · 5.3%5 · 1.8%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

46.5%20.2%14.9%9.6%8.8%Very Fast · 46.5%Fast · 20.2%Very Slow · 14.9%Medium · 9.6%Slow · 8.8%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project03691215leneliagutierrez_…12 · 19.0%ev.lawrence4030@g…9 · 14.3%angelitosantos687…6 · 9.5%ev.ninzial@gmail.…6 · 9.5%markeugedl@gmail.…5 · 7.9%gerarddunnmanco@g…5 · 7.9%ev.lounel4195@gma…5 · 7.9%karlo19bautista@g…5 · 7.9%ralphdelacerna7@g…5 · 7.9%mercadojudeann@gm…5 · 7.9%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 71)Reworks (peak 3)Projects (peak 21)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate19.30%
Estimated Quality80.70%
Points362
Kickbacks22
Projects114
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 2 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.