← Back to Leaderboard

cacanedo30@gmail.com#98 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 79 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

49.4%22.8%21.5%2 · 49.4%1 · 22.8%3 · 21.5%5 · 3.8%4 · 2.5%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

60.8%15.2%10.1%8.9%Very Fast · 60.8%Fast · 15.2%Medium · 10.1%Slow · 8.9%Very Slow · 5.1%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0246810ralphdelacerna7@g…9 · 14.5%raypostrano@gmail…8 · 12.9%ev.lawrence4030@g…7 · 11.3%mercadojudeann@gm…7 · 11.3%paolobren.dilag@g…7 · 11.3%caloysison428@gma…6 · 9.7%angelitosantos687…5 · 8.1%nathanielolid@gma…5 · 8.1%gerarddunnmanco@g…4 · 6.5%karlo19bautista@g…4 · 6.5%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 35)Reworks (peak 2)Projects (peak 12)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate5.06%
Estimated Quality94.94%
Points263
Kickbacks4
Projects79
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 0 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.