← Back to Leaderboard

juliodarylm@gmail.com#100 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 77 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

53.2%23.4%15.6%7.8%2 · 53.2%1 · 23.4%3 · 15.6%4 · 7.8%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

46.8%22.1%14.3%10.4%6.5%Very Fast · 46.8%Fast · 22.1%Medium · 14.3%Very Slow · 10.4%Slow · 6.5%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0246810arbie.zbl@gmail.c…10 · 16.4%ev.ninzial@gmail.…9 · 14.8%rona_alt@1m8.ai7 · 11.5%markeugedl@gmail.…6 · 9.8%mabs1797@yahoo.com6 · 9.8%ev.pablo3@gmail.c…5 · 8.2%baluyotcaren017@g…5 · 8.2%marygladys.badill…5 · 8.2%leneliagutierrez_…4 · 6.6%renzqa_alt@gmail.…4 · 6.6%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 46)Reworks (peak 1)Projects (peak 16)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate3.90%
Estimated Quality96.10%
Points239
Kickbacks3
Projects77
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 1 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.