← Back to Leaderboard

kieferslee19@gmail.com#104 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 75 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

44.0%33.3%20.0%2 · 44.0%3 · 33.3%1 · 20.0%4 · 2.7%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

36.0%21.3%20.0%14.7%8.0%Very Slow · 36.0%Fast · 21.3%Slow · 20.0%Very Fast · 14.7%Medium · 8.0%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0246810mabs1797@yahoo.com9 · 18.0%leneliagutierrez_…7 · 14.0%ev.lawrence4030@g…6 · 12.0%renzfrancia@gmail…5 · 10.0%gerarddunnmanco@g…5 · 10.0%ralphdelacerna7@g…4 · 8.0%caloysison428@gma…4 · 8.0%ev.lounel4195@gma…4 · 8.0%baluyotcaren017@g…3 · 6.0%markeugedl@gmail.…3 · 6.0%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 32)Reworks (peak 2)Projects (peak 10)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate17.33%
Estimated Quality82.67%
Points231
Kickbacks13
Projects75
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 2 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.