← Back to Leaderboard

melvinbenedictos_alt@1m8.ai#106 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 72 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

40.3%36.1%19.4%2 · 40.3%1 · 36.1%3 · 19.4%5 · 2.8%4 · 1.4%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

62.5%18.1%11.1%Very Fast · 62.5%Fast · 18.1%Medium · 11.1%Slow · 4.2%Very Slow · 4.2%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0246810mabs1797@yahoo.com9 · 15.5%ev.joannepagba@gm…8 · 13.8%leneliagutierrez_…6 · 10.3%ev.ninzial@gmail.…6 · 10.3%rona_alt@1m8.ai6 · 10.3%aaron_alt@1m8.ai5 · 8.6%baluyotcaren017@g…5 · 8.6%markeugedl@gmail.…5 · 8.6%ev.1971teresa@gma…4 · 6.9%arbie.zbl@gmail.c…4 · 6.9%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 33)Reworks (peak 1)Projects (peak 11)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate1.39%
Estimated Quality98.61%
Points221
Kickbacks1
Projects72
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 0 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.