← Back to Leaderboard

darelmmaglaqui01@gmail.com#108 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 70 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

45.7%28.6%18.6%2 · 45.7%1 · 28.6%3 · 18.6%4 · 4.3%5 · 2.9%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

42.9%17.1%15.7%12.9%11.4%Very Slow · 42.9%Slow · 17.1%Very Fast · 15.7%Fast · 12.9%Medium · 11.4%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0246810ev.ninzial@gmail.…9 · 17.6%leneliagutierrez_…6 · 11.8%marygladys.badill…6 · 11.8%rona_alt@1m8.ai6 · 11.8%renzqa_alt@gmail.…5 · 9.8%ev.pablo3@gmail.c…4 · 7.8%ev.lounel4195@gma…4 · 7.8%ev.felino1128@gma…4 · 7.8%ev.joannepagba@gm…4 · 7.8%renzfrancia@gmail…3 · 5.9%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 25)Reworks (peak 3)Projects (peak 9)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate18.57%
Estimated Quality81.43%
Points220
Kickbacks13
Projects70
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 2 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.