← Back to Leaderboard

kimdanieltayao@gmail.com#112 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 63 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

39.7%38.1%14.3%1 · 39.7%2 · 38.1%3 · 14.3%4 · 4.8%5 · 3.2%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

39.7%33.3%11.1%7.9%7.9%Very Fast · 39.7%Very Slow · 33.3%Slow · 11.1%Fast · 7.9%Medium · 7.9%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0246810ev.ryan2047@gmail…8 · 17.0%ralphdelacerna7@g…7 · 14.9%raypostrano@gmail…7 · 14.9%ev.lawrence4030@g…5 · 10.6%nathanielolid@gma…4 · 8.5%gerarddunnmanco@g…4 · 8.5%marflasola21@gmai…3 · 6.4%paolobren.dilag@g…3 · 6.4%angelitosantos687…3 · 6.4%ev.joannepagba@gm…3 · 6.4%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 37)Reworks (peak 4)Projects (peak 12)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate33.33%
Estimated Quality66.67%
Points182
Kickbacks21
Projects63
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 2 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.