← Back to Leaderboard

michael04.mn@gmail.com#116 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 40 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

50.0%27.5%17.5%2 · 50.0%1 · 27.5%3 · 17.5%4 · 5.0%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

40.0%35.0%12.5%7.5%Very Fast · 40.0%Very Slow · 35.0%Fast · 12.5%Medium · 7.5%Slow · 5.0%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project0246810rona_alt@1m8.ai8 · 25.0%baluyotcaren017@g…4 · 12.5%markeugedl@gmail.…3 · 9.4%mabs1797@yahoo.com3 · 9.4%leneliagutierrez_…3 · 9.4%harveycvillostas@…3 · 9.4%arbie.zbl@gmail.c…2 · 6.2%ev.1971teresa@gma…2 · 6.2%renzfrancia@gmail…2 · 6.2%ev.lounel4195@gma…2 · 6.2%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 35)Reworks (peak 5)Projects (peak 13)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate25.00%
Estimated Quality75.00%
Points119
Kickbacks10
Projects40
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 1 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.