← Back to Leaderboard

tarsyoman@gmail.com#117 of 131

2026-11-01 — 2026-11-14 (PHT) · 39 records · source: cleaned payroll export

Complexity Chart

46.2%28.2%15.4%10.3%2 · 46.2%1 · 28.2%3 · 15.4%4 · 10.3%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by complexity level

Speed Tier

51.3%12.8%12.8%12.8%10.3%Very Slow · 51.3%Very Fast · 12.8%Fast · 12.8%Slow · 12.8%Medium · 10.3%
hover a slice to highlight it · share of records by speed tier

QA Activity

Numbers of QA checked your Project012345marflasola21@gmai…4 · 16.0%arbie.zbl@gmail.c…4 · 16.0%ev.joannepagba@gm…3 · 12.0%baluyotcaren017@g…3 · 12.0%angelitosantos687…2 · 8.0%ev.1971teresa@gma…2 · 8.0%ev.lawrence4030@g…2 · 8.0%leneliagutierrez_…2 · 8.0%gerarddunnmanco@g…2 · 8.0%karlo19bautista@g…1 · 4.0%
hover a bar for detail · top 10 reviewers by records checked

Daily Trend

Points (peak 20)Reworks (peak 4)Projects (peak 7)0%20%40%60%80%100%11-0111-0211-0311-0411-0511-0611-0711-0811-0911-1011-1111-1211-1311-14
each series scaled to its own peak · hover a day column for exact values
Rework Rate43.59%
Estimated Quality56.41%
Points120
Kickbacks17
Projects39
Rework Rate = kickbacks ÷ records × 100. Estimated Quality = 100 − Rework Rate.
Kickback penalty rows (a kickback moved to the originally assigned technician) are included as 0-point records; 1 such record(s) appear here. Source TSVs are unmodified.